WebAug 19, 2024 · To reduce physical log file size, execute a file shrink operation after the log backup. Often heard recommendation The default recommendation that often is given on the internet and in many forums is actually: change to the simple recovery model, (truncate your log file - available only on previous SQL versions) and shrink the log file to reclaim … WebAug 31, 2009 · Inactive log records are not discarded at a checkpoint and future log backups will succeed. That’s the main difference. Log records will still be retained after a backup to …
SQL Server: Restrict the use of NO_LOG and Truncate_Only
WebMar 27, 2008 · In SQL Server 2005 books online it says the following: We recommend that you never use NO_LOG or TRUNCATE_ONLY to manually truncate the transaction log, because this breaks the log chain. Until the next full or differential database backup, the database is not protected from media failure. Use manual log truncation in only very … WebDec 22, 2024 · Solution. By using the following scripts, I was able to cut down the time to less than 1/3 compared with using “sp_delete_backuphistory”, and because it works in all SQL Server versions from 2005 to 2024, with a multi-server query we can purge all MSDB databases at once, if you’re brave enough. city betty restaurant toronto
Reduce Transaction Log File Size - Backup vs Shrink vs Truncate ...
WebNov 23, 2015 · Use the following T-SQL command to make transaction log backup: In order to create transaction log backup with SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) right click … Web13. A full backup does NOT truncate the log, you must perform a backup log operation. A full backup does NOT re-set the log chain -- that would totally screw up replication/log … WebMay 3, 2010 · Not only that, you will also not able to use subsequent log files. 2) Shrinking database file or database adds fragmentation. There are a lot of things you can do. First, … dick trailer hitch